Showing posts with label Green Investment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Green Investment. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Five myths behind rising gas prices

Source: AJC

Gasoline prices have been steadily climbing for several months, and Americans are feeling the pain at the pump. The possible culprits (from greedy oil execs to Mideast turmoil) are as plentiful as the proposed solutions (more offshore drilling, green energy or government reserves). But what is really driving prices up? And what, if anything, can be done about it? Let’s take a moment to fill up on information about our fuel.


1. Fighting in Libya is sending gas prices higher.


Libya is not a big enough global oil supplier for the battles there to have a meaningful effect on gas prices. In the 1970s and early 1980s, Libya was a major U.S. supplier, selling us about 700,000 barrels of oil per day. But today, we import less than 50,000 barrels per day from Libya — a tiny fraction of the 9.2 million barrels per day the United States imported in 2010. So why are gas prices up?
Though Moammar Gadhafi’s fate is largely irrelevant to the oil market, unrest throughout the greater Middle East is not. The Persian Gulf region produces almost 24 million barrels of oil per day, more than 25 percent of global oil consumption. The Arab spring that has brought protests to Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Yemen makes markets nervous, and when markets fret over a possible disruption to oil supplies, gas prices rise — whether the disruption materializes or not.

2. Tapping the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, SPR, is a smart way to reduce gas prices.


The U.S. government maintains a 727 million-barrel oil reserve — 38 days’ worth at current levels of consumption — to protect against potential supply disruptions. But just about every time prices rise, politicians want to access the oil in the reserve to increase supply and bring prices back down. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., for instance, has been calling for oil releases from the SPR for more than a decade. In a letter to President Bill Clinton in 1999, he endorsed the release of several hundred thousand barrels a day from the SPR because, according to a news release about the letter, oil prices had made a “meteoric ascent to nearly $25 per barrel.”


Had Clinton dipped into the reserve then, as Schumer requested, we almost certainly would have gotten a raw deal. What if that $25-per-barrel oil could be replenished only at $75 per barrel? Tapping the SPR makes the government an oil speculator, and any nation running record deficits that becomes a commodity trader is playing a dangerous game.


3. Oil companies produce less in the spring to make gas prices increase.


Almost every year, gasoline prices rise in the spring. At the same time, refineries produce less fuel. This isn’t because oil companies want to keep inventories low to drive prices higher. It’s because what’s in our gasoline — specifically, butane — changes from season to season. Butane is a cheap ingredient in gasoline that boils at low temperatures. In winter, this isn’t a problem. But in summer, butane evaporates from gas, polluting the air while leaving us with less fuel in the tank than we paid for. As temperatures rise, refineries replace butane with more costly ingredients and draw down winter inventories just as beach season begins. Chemistry, not corporate conspiracy, limits supply.


4. The Obama administration is driving up gas prices.


Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin says the White House drilling moratorium shows President Barack Obama’s “culpability in the high gas prices hurting Americans.” Blaming the president for rising gas prices is nothing new, and it’s a bipartisan tactic. In 2004, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., blamed President George W. Bush for higher gas prices and for continuing to fill the SPR as oil prices climbed. Just one problem: Even if domestic supplies were developed, American presidents couldn’t really control oil prices. The U.S. government has estimated that there are 18 billion barrels of oil in the outer continental shelf of the lower 48 states that are off limits to development. That may sound like a lot, but it is only about
2 1/2 years of supply for the U.S., and it would take several years to allocate leases and drill exploratory wells.

Even if the estimated 10 billion barrels of oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge were available for development, today’s policy decisions would have no impact on gasoline supplies for as much as a decade. Obama can’t dictate what you’ll pay for premium tomorrow.
5. Americans can’t live without cheap gas.

Yes, Americans love to drive, and Americans love cheap gas. But across an ocean, there’s a continent filled with people a lot like us who’ve lived with high gas prices for years.
While U.S. gasoline heads toward $4 per gallon, Europeans have been paying much higher prices for years because of high taxes on fuel. Last month in Britain, gas hit about $9.76 per gallon. Because gas is so dear, Europe’s per capita energy use is half that of the U.S., leaving Europe less vulnerable to oil price shocks yet not undermining its standard of living. The U.S., built on cheap oil, is much less densely populated than the Old World, with more wide-open spaces to traverse. But that doesn’t mean we can’t embrace some of what has helped Europeans keep their gasoline bills down — such as high-speed rail, public transportation and green energy.

In fact, Americans have shown that they can adjust their behavior when faced with sticker shock at the pump. As gas prices rose from $2.31 per gallon in 2005 to $3.30 per gallon in 2008, sales of the Toyota Prius eclipsed those of the Ford Explorer, and public transit use reached a 50-year high. When it costs $30 to fill up a Geo Metro, all options are on the table.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

INNOVATING TOWARD OUR NEXT GREAT INDUSTRY

From Appliedmaterials.com:

Yesterday, from the White House, Vice President Biden released a new report, “The Recovery Act: Transforming the American Economy through Innovation,” which outlines how the administration’s $100 billion investment in innovation has been, for the most part, money well spent. In his remarks, Biden highlighted four key areas where stimulus money was working: •Modernizing transportation •Jumpstarting the renewable energy sector •Investing in groundbreaking medical research •Building a platform that will enhance the private sector’s

The recurring theme in the speech was that without innovation, the prospect of creating America’s next great industries will remain an elusive fantasy. The Recovery Act has been one of the main catalysts for turning that fantasy into reality. But, as Biden made clear, the government can only do so much; in the end, it is the private sector that will drive this change. He noted: “Government plants the seeds, the private sector makes them grow, and we launch entire industries, create hundreds of thousands of jobs, and spark new forms of commerce that were once unimaginable.”

While the vice president lamented this country’s lackluster investment in renewable energy over the last thirty years, causing the U.S. to lose its competitive edge, the administration is quickly making up for lost time. President Obama, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and Vice President Biden have set a joint goal to double U.S. renewable energy generation capacity from wind, solar and geothermal by 2012, which the report states is ahead of schedule. Because of stimulus-funded solar energy projects, the U.S. is now on pace to cut the cost of solar power in half by 2015, bringing the price of this energy source ever closer to achieving the ‘holy grail’ of grid parity. Biden even speculated that one day solar power could be “cheaper than electricity from the grid,” but it is going to take scale to get the job done.

Increasing renewable energy generation capacity will invariably spur an increase in renewable energy manufacturing capacity as well. If the U.S. can achieve its goal of doubling its annual output of 6 GW of renewable equipment to 12 GW by the end of next year, this would increase our country’s share of global manufacturing of solar PV modules from 8 percent of all production to 14 percent by 2012. Ensuring that the necessary incentives are in place for keeping clean energy manufacturers in this country, and potentially attracting foreign companies to relocate their operations here, will be key. This is why it is so vital that programs like the Manufacturing Tax Credit (48C) be extended. Already, the House Ways & Means Committee has circulated a discussion draft of the Domestic Manufacturing and Energy Jobs Act of 2010, which includes an expansion of the 48C program. Ways & Means, along with the full House, needs to move forward with this in September, and the Senate ought to follow suit. A national renewable electricity standard (RES), which the Senate will hopefully take a closer look at when it returns from recess next month, would also go a long way toward keeping the U.S. a leader in this emerging industry.

Without an RES at the national level, the fight will be forced to happen at the regional and state levels, which will undoubtedly slow down the transition toward a clean energy economy. The opportunity to achieve a strong federal RES is something we simply can’t lose.

We have the seeds to become a dominant force in this next great industry; let’s make sure we make them grow.