Showing posts with label Energy legislation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Energy legislation. Show all posts

Monday, January 10, 2011

Support U.S. Businesses Making Green Investments

Source: AJC



If there’s one thing Americans agree on in these divided times, it’s the urgent need to move toward cleaner energy. Polls as recently as November show a majority of Americans favoring comprehensive energy reform that limits pollution, develops domestic sources and stimulates renewable power.


We’re not likely to get comprehensive reform in the year ahead, but I still see strong paths toward a cleaner, more sustainable economy.

That’s because smart entrepreneurs are taking the lead. They see the “green” in green and don’t want to miss out on the next big industrial revolution transforming the global economy.

Corporate clean tech innovations were, in fact, the buzz at the recent international climate treaty talks in Cancun, Mexico. At a side meeting for business leaders, Dow Chemical CEO Andrew Liveris announced that his company is reaping $50 billion in annual revenues from the sale of its clean tech products. Solar shingles, coatings for energy-saving “cool” roofs, and sugarcane-based plastic, which emits far fewer greenhouse gases than petroleum-based plastic, are just some of Dow’s budding green technologies.

Green infrastructure giant Siemens’ portfolio likewise topped $37 billion in 2010. Nearly half of its 8,000-plus inventions last year involved technologies that improve energy efficiency and sustainability: innovations such as coatings for power plant turbine blades, ultra-efficient lighting systems, and electric car charging technologies.

Perhaps most impressive was Coca-Cola’s announcement that it has removed the potent global warming pollutant HFC from 200,000 of its refrigeration units, and that it hopes to make its entire supply chain of 10 million refrigeration units completely HFC-free by 2015.

Even better, Coca-Cola, Greenpeace and other stakeholders convinced a consortium of 400 global consumer goods manufacturers to join their effort, and the group has now pledged a “gigaton-scale commitment” to phase out HFC refrigerants by 2015. Getting their peers on board means that scaling up this new technology will happen more quickly and cheaply. A win-win for everyone.

Beyond corporate initiatives, emerging economies also give me hope for green progress in 2011. These rising tigers — some with the fastest-growing greenhouse gas emissions in the world — are taking concrete steps to reduce their contribution to global climate change.

India began levying a carbon tax on coal producers in July, just one month before the U.S. Senate abandoned its efforts to pass a comprehensive climate bill. India will use those revenues to finance clean energy development.

Brazil passed a national law requiring 32 emissions-reducing activities and adopted a voluntary goal of reducing its emissions by more than one-third by 2020.

And China is globally dominating the wind and solar power industries. Though it still relies heavily on coal, China has pledged to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP by 40 to 45 percent by 2020.

While these actions foster hope, they also leave me wondering why the United States is still stuck on fossil fuels and continues to cede the green industrial revolution — and the jobs that come with it — to other nations. China already boasts more than a million renewable energy jobs, five times the U.S. total.

Without strong national policies to incentivize clean technologies, voluntary business initiatives can only go so far. As Dow’s Liveris put it, “We have the technologies for a global clean economy, but they will not deploy in significant numbers without greater public policy certainty and incentives.”

The United States instead continues to seek short-term fixes from dirtier and dirtier sources of energy.

Take the proposed 1,900-mile, $12 billion Keystone oil pipeline designed to bring up to 1.5 million barrels a day of crude from Canada’s oil sands to U.S. refineries as far south as the Gulf Coast.

While the prospect of buying oil from Canadians, rather than unstable regimes, may sound appealing, there’s a catch. Extracting crude from sticky oil sands emits far more greenhouse gases per barrel than conventional oil, and it is causing widespread environmental and health problems across vast stretches of Alberta, as outlined in a new report by the Royal Canadian Society.

Why seek out dirtier sources of oil when we could be innovating electric cars and clean fuels for jets and improving vehicle efficiency standards — all of which will help us regain our competitive footing in the global economy and put Americans back to work?

And here’s the real kicker: Many of these clean technologies already exist. We just need the right policies and priorities to scale them up.

Last month’s vote in Congress to extend renewable energy tax credits — which will create 20,000 new jobs next year in the wind industry alone — is a good example of what I mean. And there are other smart policies we can adopt in the coming months, whether to expand energy efficiency or strengthen truck mileage standards, which will move the U.S. toward a cleaner energy future.

Now that would really fuel my optimism.


Thursday, December 30, 2010

2011 Energy Star Tax Credit For Metal Roofing Decreased To $500




From: EnergySavvy

As of Dec. 17, 2010 the federal energy efficiency tax credit has been extended through 2011, but the federal government has significantly changed the credit limits and eligibility requirements.

The credit will be reduced from 30 percent to 10 percent of the energy efficiency improvement costs, and the maximum tax credit will drop from $1,500 to $500. Additionally, the $500 cap will apply to anyone who received the credit from Jan. 1, 2005 to present, which means, if you claimed $500 or more of the credit at any point since Jan. 1, 2005, you won't be eligible for the 2011 extension.

If you haven't yet received the credit or haven't fully completely used the $500 available, certain energy efficiency upgrades such as ENERGY STAR appliances, HVAC systems and more will be eligible for the credit. The credit, which you'll be able to claim on your 2011 federal tax returns, will be equal to 10 percent of the cost of installation up to $500.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

GA Amendment 4 Passes

According to Ballotpedia.org, GA Amendment 4 has been voted for with a 61% favorable vote.

The amendment authorizes state multiyear contracts for energy efficiency and energy conservation projects.

Taxpayers for Energy Efficiency, in support of Amendment 4, launched their media campaign in mid-September 2010. The measure is supported by a group pf clean-energy businesses and environmental advocates, according to reports. "Amendment 4 is a win-win proposal that will...create more than 11,000 jobs and make Georgia a more energy efficient state," said Jason Rooks, the group’s director and president of Clean Energy Strategies LLC.

“According to the Georgia Environmental Finance Authority, the state currently spends about $225 million each year on energy and water for its building facilities,” state Rep. Penny Houston, R-Nashville, said in an op-ed.

“Although retrofitting the state facilities with modern, energy efficient technology would save millions of dollars each year, this option is not currently available because the state constitution bans multi-year contracts,” Houston added. “This amendment would allow the state to fund the retrofitting on a pay-as-you-go annual basis for up to ten years.”

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Senate introduces stand alone renewable energy standard bill

From ELP.com:

Washington, D.C., September 23, 2010 — Following the failure of previous energy legislation in Congress, a bipartisan group of six Senators introduced a bill to establish a federal renewable energy standard.

Sens. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Tom Udall (D-N.M.), and Mark Udall (D-Colo.) introduced the Renewable Electricity Promotion Act.

The proposed legislation would install a renewable portfolio standard (or renewable electricity standard, in D.C. parlance) requiring states to generate at least 15 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by 2021.

Electricity retailers that sell fewer than 4 million MWh are exempted from the bill's standard. Qualifying generation technologies under the bill are wind, solar, ocean, geothermal, biomass, landfill gas, waste-to-energy, hydrokinetic and new hydropower at existing dams.

There are currently 36 states in the Union that already have some form of renewable portfolio standard, alternative energy portfolio standard or renewable energy goal, according to the Pew Center on Global Climate Change.

These “patchwork” state-level standards vary widely in their target dates, generation targets and technologies that count toward the goal.

North Carolina’s RPS, for example, requires a 12.5 percent renewable energy standard by 2021, and allows solar power, wind power, hydropower, geothermal energy, wave and tidal energy, biomass and energy efficiency.

New York’s RPS has the goal of 25 percent renewable generation by 2013, and allows biomass, biofuel, hydro, solar, ocean, wave, tidal and wind.

States that lack renewable energy plans are Idaho, Wyoming, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana and Alaska.

Early critics of the Senate legislation point out that the targets set by the act are actually lower than the amount of non-hydro renewable electricity already being generated today.

These sources increased 13 percent during the first six months of 2010 over the amount generated during the first half of 2009, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Wind-generated electricity increased by 21.4 percent; electricity from solar thermal and photovoltaics rose by 16.4 percent; wood & other forms of biomass rose by 4.5 percent; and geothermal output increased by 0.8 percent.

Efforts by Democrats to push forward the Senate’s major climate change bill, which included a cap-and-trade mechanism to lower carbon dioxide emissions, stalled in mid-July after the bill failed to attract Republican support.

Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) introduced more modest legislation without a federal RPS or cap and trade in the Senate in late July. However this bill also failed to attract the bipartisan support needed to move it forward.

President Barack Obama, who set his goal as a candidate on a federal RPS of 25 percent by 2025, has instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate carbon dioxide directly if no legislative fix is possible. In response, the EPA has issued rules requiring power plants to obtain permits for their carbon dioxide emissions.